Is God omnipresent or is He present in one?

Is God omnipresent or is He present in one?

Among the religions prevalent in the world, some do not accept the existence of God at all, but among those religions, which believe in God, most believe God to be omnipresent. In Hinduism, on the one side, God has been considered to be omnipresent and on the other side God’s incarnations have also been depicted.
Please think that if the Supreme Soul was omnipresent then all the human beings would become Supreme Father, whereas we speak of brotherhood in the world. If everyone becomes a father, then who would give us the inheritance of imperishable prosperity, peace, mukti (liberation) and jeevanmukti (liberation while being alive)? If God is omnipresent then why it has been mentioned in Gita that whenever there is degradation of religion I come. If God is omnipresent, then the question of His arrival in a special way does not arise at all and then His virtues should also be present in all the human beings, whereas the history of the world tells (us) that with the passage of time, the human beings have been undergoing degradation. If God was present in everyone then where is the need for Sanyasis to wander in the jungles in search of God and why do we visit temples and pilgrimage centers to have a glimpse of God? One of the reasons why Hindus consider the Supreme Soul to be omnipresent is the mention of a word ‘vibhu:’ in Gita. But actually, this word is not a symbol of the Supreme Soul being omnipresent, but it is symbolic of the one who takes birth in a special way or the one who enters someone else’s body.
The theory of God not being omnipresent was propounded mainly from 1936/37 by Om Mandali/Brahmakumari organization. Until the founder of Brahmakumari Organization Dada Lekhraj was alive, the Brahmakumar-kumaris used to claim that the incorporeal God Shiv enters into the body of Dada Lekhraj (alias Brahma) and is teaching Godly knowledge and they are transforming the hell into the heaven. Although the Brahmakumar-kumaris claim in front of the world even after the demise of Dada Lekhraj in 1969 that God is not omnipresent, but they do not tell that in which one person is He present, i.e. sitting on which corporeal human body-like chariot is God giving the true Gita knowledge.
If the administrators of the Brahmakumari organization are asked this question, then they say that since 1969 incorporeal Shiv enters into the body of BK Gulzar Dadi on pre-determined days of a fixed period (from October to March) every year and narrates Avyakta Vanis. Gulzar Dadiji is a pure virgin while it has been mentioned in the Godly versions published by Brahmakumari Institution that God enters into a sinful body and not in the body of a pure virgin. All the incarnations of God in human form which are famous in the Hindu religion are just in a male form and the religious fathers of all the religions are also just men. Although it is true that when God incarnates on the Earth, then He gives the pot of knowledge to the mothers and virgins for distribution, but in the picture of Trimurty Shiv published by the Brahmakumari institution itself all the three personalities which perform the three divine tasks of God are just men.
While explaining about the picture of Trimurty, it is told by the Brahmakumari Institution that initially a new world, i.e. a pure Brahmin religion is established within the old world by Brahma (Dada Lekhraj). And then the destruction of the old hellish world takes place through Shankar. And then in the end, the sustenance of the new deity world takes place through Vishnu, i.e. Shri Lakshmi & Shri Narayan. Dada Lekhraj expired in 1969 but neither the complete establishment of the pure Brahmin religion could take place amidst this old world nor the destruction of old world, old religions, old traditions could take place. After 1969, the number of demoniac Brahmins started increasing in the Rudra Gyan Yagya established by God. If the Brahmakumari institution believes that God Shiv comes in Gulzar Dadi, then why do they mainly publicize the administrators of the institution namely, BK Prakashmani Dadi, BK Janaki Dadi and in the end BK Gulzar Dadi or any other Dadi or Dada in most of their publicity materials? And why is it publicized every year on the occasion of Shivjayanti that God Shiv has already incarnated in the body of Prajapita Brahma (i.e. Dada Lekhraj) whereas they know that Dada Lekhraj had expired.
Apart from this the Brahmakumar-kumaris after 1969 remember the Supreme Soul Shiv in the form of a point of light and not as an incorporeal God who has come in a corporeal form. And then in whichever ashram of the Brahmakumari institution the Godly versions, i.e. Gyan murlis are narrated, it is explained to the seekers of knowledge that they should think as if God Shiv is Himself sitting and narrating knowledge and as if Prajapita Brahma (Dada Lekhraj) is alive. In this way, although the Brahmakumari institution tells the world that God is not omnipresent, but it does not tell about that one person in whom the Supreme Soul is present, i.e. in which human body has He come? And their telling that whoever may be reading the Godly versions, i.e murli, the listeners should think that God Shiv is teaching, proves that God is omnipresent.
So, then in which one person is the Supreme Soul present? Did the Supreme Father Shiv return to the Supreme Abode without completing His divine task? No. The Supreme Father Shiv has incarnated on this land of India since 1936-37 and after the demise of Dada Lekhraj in 1969, in order to first destroy the demoniac Brahmins who have emerged in the Rudra Gyaan Yagya (Brahmakumari institution) and later the old world, God Shiv is performing the unworldly (aloukik) task of Shankar through an ordinary human body in the town of Kampilya, the incognito residence of the Pandavas in Uttar Pradesh, which is famous as the land of incarnation of God. He is awakening by blowing the trumpet of knowledge those alokik Brahmins, i.e. Brahmakumar-kumaris who have gone into the slumber of ignorance listening to the sweet tunes of the flute of knowledge narrated through Dada Lekhraj.
In this way, the Supreme Soul Shiv is not omnipresent, but is present in one person. Seated on an ordinary human body-like chariot, narrating the true Gita knowledge He is re-establishing Aadi Sanaatan Devi Devata Dharma which has almost disappeared. Omshanti.

Related Murli points:
The matter of omnipresence (of God) has also been picked up from Gita. The Father says – I teach the souls Rajyog, then how can (I) be omnipresent? How can the Father-Teacher-Guru be omnipresent? The Father says – I am your Father, then I am an ocean of knowledge. – Murli dated 11.10.05, pg.3
You sit and defame Krishna who was the master of the world. You defame me too. I, the giver of true salvation to you; you say that I am present in a dog, a cat, and in every particle. Baba says how sinful you have become. – Murli dated 18.10.05, pg. 2

Murali Points

Rakhis and Tilak

· "Patit paavan Baap kahtey hain – tum pavitra bano toh tumko rajtilak milega. Yah baat hai sangam kee. Jabki manushya pukaartey hain patit-paavan aao. Yahaan toh raajaai hai nahee. Baap kahtey hain tum patit bhrashtaachaari say paavan shreshthaachaari banengey toh raajaai kaa tilak tumko milega. Tilak koi diya nahee jata hai, yah toh samjhaya jata hai. Patit duniya may toh hai hee patit ka patit par rajya. Ab paavan ban-ney kee pratigya karo. Pratigya akshar bhi kahney may aataa hai, lekin hai gyaan kee baat. Bachchey jaantey hain ham patit-paavan, gyaan saagar Baap kay bachchey baney hain toh jaroor hamko paavan ban-na hoga. Baaki toh rakshabandhan kay din rakhi baandhney va tilak deney ka sawaal nahee uthtaa hai. Tum tilak kahaan detey ho? Bhakti marg may rasam nikaal dee hai, arth toh kuch bhi samajhtey nahee hain……Bhagwaanuvaach mamekam yaad karo toh is yog agni say tum pavitra banongey. Ismay toh rakhi kee koi baat hee nahee…….Tyohar jo manaatey aatey hain, vah andhshraddha say kar letey hain, paisa kamaaney ke liye. Aagey Brahman log toh ek hee kisam kee rakhi ley jaatey thay. Male-female sabko baandhtey thay. Ek paisa mil jaata tha." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 31.07.07, pg 1&2)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki tilak lagaaney ya rakhi baandhney ki jaroorat hee nahee hai. Fir kya rakshabandhan ke din ham brahmanon ke alokik parivar may behnon dwara bhaiyon ko sthool tilak lagaakar sthool rakhi baandhna aur badley may paisey sweekar kiya jana uchit hai?


· “The Father, who is the purifier of the sinful ones, says – If you become pure, you would receive the raajtilak (royal vermillion mark applied on the forehead at the time of coronation). This is a matter of the Confluence Age, when the human beings call (God) saying – O purifier of the sinful ones, come! There is no kingship here. The Father says – If you get transformed from a sinful unrighteous one to a pure righteous one, you would get the tilak of kingship. Tilak is not applied; it is just explained. In the sinful world, it is only the rule of the sinful ones over the sinful ones. Now take a vow to become pure. The word ‘pratigya’ (vow/pledge) is also uttered, but it is a matter of the knowledge. The children know that we have become the children of the father, the purifier of the sinful ones, the ocean of knowledge; so, we would have to definitely become pure. As regards the question of tying rakhi or applying tilak on the day of Rakshabandhan, it does not arise at all. You do not apply tilak. A custom has been started in the path of worship; but they do not understand the meaning……God says – Remember only me, then you would become pure through this fire of yog. There is no question of tying rakhi in this……The festivals which people have been celebrating, they celebrate it out of blind faith for the purpose of earning money. Earlier the Brahmins used to take only one kind of rakhees. They used to tie it to males as well as females. They used to get one paisa.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 31.07.07, pg 1&2 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that there is no need to apply tilak or to tie rakhi at all. Then, is it appropriate for the sisters to apply tilak physically or tie rakhi physically on the wrists of the brothers and to accept money in return, in the alokik family of us Brahmins?

*************************************************************************************

Stop Remembering Pictures / Chitra Dekhana Band Karo

· "Baap kahtey hain joa bhi aakaari, sakari va niraakaari chitra hain – unhein tumhey yaad nahee karnaa hai. Tumko toh lakshya diya jata hai. Manushya toh chitra dekh kar yaad kartey hain. Baba toh kahtey hain chitron ko dekhnaa ab band karo. Yah hai bhaktimarg…….Toh koi bhi chitra ka simran nahee karnaa hai. Yah jo Shiv ka chitra hai unka bhi dhyaan nahee karnaa hai, kyonki Shiv toh aisa hai nahee. Jaisey ham aatma bhrikuti kay beech may rahtee hain, vaisey Baba bhi kahtey hain, mai thodi jagah lekar is aatma kay baajoo may baith jaataa hoon. Rathee ban inko baith gyaan detaa hoon. Inki aatma may bhi gyaan nahee tha. Jaisey inki aatmaa rathee boltee hai shareeer dwara, vaisey mai bhi in organs say boltaa hoon. Nahee toh kaisey samjhaaun." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 25.06.07, pg 2 & 3)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki “joa bhi aakaari, sakari va niraakaari chitra hain – unhein tumhey yaad nahee karnaa hai..” Toh kya Ishwariya gyaan yagya may dehdhaariyon kay chitra pradarshit karnaa bhakti marg nahee hai?

· “The father says that – you should not remember any subtle, corporeal or incorporeal picture. You are given a target. Human beings remember (God) with the help of pictures. Baba says – stop seeing pictures now. This (i.e. seeing pictures) is path of worship……So, one should not remember any picture. One should not even remember this picture of Shiv because Shiv is not like this. Just as we souls live in the middle of the bhrikuti (the spot on the forehead between two eyebrows), similarly Baba also says – I take a little space and sit beside this soul. I become a charioteer and give him knowledge. The soul of this one too did not have knowledge. Just as the the charioteer-like soul of this one, speaks through the body, similarly I too speak through these organs. Otherwise, how would I explain?” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 25.06.07, pg 2 & 3 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that – “you should not remember any subtle, corporeal or incorporeal picture.” Is it not bhakti to display pictures of bodily beings in the Godly yagya of knowledge?

*************************************************************************************

Baba's Language / Baba kee Bhasha

· "Smritilabdha akshar bhi abhi ka hai. Iska matlab yah nahee samajhnaa chaahiye ki Bhagwaan nay aakar Sanskrit may Gita sunaai hai. Sanskrit hoti toh tum bachhey kuch nahee samajhtey. Hindi bhasha hee mukhya hai. Jo is Brahma kee bhasha hai, us bhasha may hee samjhaa rahey hain. Kalpa-Kalpa isee bhasha may samjhaatey hain. Tum jaantey ho ham BapDada ke saamney baithey hain. Yah ghar hai - Mama, Baba, behen aur Bhai. Bas aur koi sambandh nahee. Bhai-bahin ka sambandh tab hai jab Prajapita Brahma kay baney ho. Nahee toh aatma kay sambandh say toh bhai-bhai hain." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 22.06.07, pg 2)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki “Hindi bhasha hee mukhya hai. Jo is Brahma kee bhasha hai, us bhasha may hee samjhaa rahey hain.” Kintu Brahma Baba ki bhasha toh Sindhi thi. Toh Shivbaba kis Brahma ki baat kar rahey hain, jiski bhasha may vay samjhaatey hain? Shivbaba nay Brahma Baba may pravesh jaroor kiya, kintu unhonay keval maa kee bhoomika nibhaai. Jab Shiv Baap ke roop may kisi Brahma may pravesh kartey hain, toh us Brahma kee bhasha keval Hindi hoti hai.
- Jab Brahman parivaar may maat-pita, behen aur bhai ko chod kar koi aur sambandh hee nahee hai toh fir Dadi aur Dada ka sambandh kahaan say aa gaya?

“The word 'Smritirlabdha' (to be in the remembrance of God) also pertains to the present time. It should not be construed to mean that God came and narrated Gita in Sanskrit. Had it been Sanskrit, you children would not have understood anything. Hindi language is the main one. Whichever is the language of this Brahma, the explanation is being given in the same language. Explanation is given in this language every Kalpa. You know that we are sitting in front of BapDada. This is a house - Mama, Baba, Sister and Brother. That is all, there is no other relationship. The relationship of brother and Sister is when we have become (the children) of Prajapita; otherwise, as per the relationship of the souls all are brothers.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 22.06.07, pg 2 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that – “Hindi language is the main one. Whichever is the language of this Brahma, the explanation is being given in the same language.” But Brahma Baba's language was Sindhi. So, which Brahma is ShivBaba talking about, in whose language He explains? ShivBaba did enter Brahma Baba, but played only the role of a mother. When Shiv enters into a Brahma in the form of a Father, the language of that Brahma is Hindi only.
- When there is no other relationship except mother, Father, Sister and Brother in the Brahmin family, then where did the relationship of Dadi, and Dada come from?

Murali Points

Importance of the word Prajapita

"Baba samjhaatey rahtey hain. Correction bhi kartey jaao. Brahmakumar kumariyon kay aagey Prajapita Brahma jaroor likhnaa chaahiye. Prajapita kahney say Baap siddh ho jata hai. Ham prashna hee poochtey hain ki Prajapita Brahma say kya sambandh hai? Kyonki Brahma naam toh bahuton kay hain. Koi female ka naam bhi Brahma hai. Prajapita naam toh kiska hota nahee, isliye Prajapita akshar bahut jaroori hai. Prajapita Aadi Dev kahtey hain. Parantu Aadi Dev ka arth nahee samajhtey. Prajapita toh jaroor yahaan hee hoga na. Aadi Dev fir vah Brahma (sookshma) ho jata hai. Aadi arthaat shuruaat ka. Prajapita Brahma ko fir beti hai Saraswati. Sookshmavatan may toh beti ho na sakey. Rachayita toh yahaan hai na. In guhya baaton ko vishaalbuddhi vaaley hee dhaaran kar saktey hain. Dharanaa kay saath manners bhi chaahiye. Jo koi bhi dekh khush ho. Tumharaa bol jo nikaltaa hai unko ratna kaha jata hai." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 06.09.07, pg 2)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki Prajapita akshar bahut jaroori hai. Isliye Brahmakumar-kumariyon kay aagey Prajapita jaroor likhna chaahiye. Lekin Brahmakumari sanstha kay sadasya swayam ko keval Brahmakumar-kumari (BK) kahlaatey hain na ki Prajapita Brahmakumar-kumari (PBK). Saath hee Prajapita Brahmakumari Iswariya Vishwa Vidyalaya ko sansaaar kay saamney Brahmakumari sanstha kay roop may prastut kiya jata hai. Kya aisa karnaa Shrimat kay anuroop hai?


· “Baba keeps explaining. Also go on making corrections. One must definitely write the word ‘Prajapita Brahma’ before ‘Brahmakumar-kumaris’. By saying ‘Prajapita’ the Father is proved. The question that we precisely ask is that – what is your relationship with Prajapita Brahma? It is because many people have the name Brahma. Some female also has the name Brahma. Nobody has the name Prajapita. That is why the word ‘Prajapita’ is very important. [People] say Prajapita Aadi Dev. But they do not understand the meaning of Aadi Dev. Prajapita would certainly be here, won’t he? Aadi Dev then becomes that (subtle) Brahma. Aadi means ‘from the beginning’. Then Prajapita has a daughter- Saraswati. He cannot have a daughter in the subtle world. The Creator is here, isn’t he? Only those with a broad intellect can understand/inculcate these secret matters. Along with inculcation (of the secret matters) such manners are also required that anyone would feel happy on seeing. The words that emerge from your mouth are called gems.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 06.09.07, pg 2 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that the word ‘Prajapita’ is very important. That is why one must definitely prefix the word ‘Prajapita Brahma’ to ‘Brahmakumar-kumaris’. But the members of Brahmakumari institution call themselves as Brahmakumar-kumaris (BKs) and not as Prajapita Brahmakumar-kumaris (PBKs). Moreover Prajapita Brahmakumari Ishwariya Vishwavidyalay is presented to the world in the form of Brahmakumari institution. Is it in accordance with the Shrimat to do so?

****************************************************************************************

Listening to murali word by word

"Tum bachchey tape say bhi Baba kee Murli suntey ho. Bachchey chaahtey hain tape say ham akshar by akshar sunein. Jinko shauk hoga, paisey vaaley hongey, udaarchitt hongey toh auron kaa bhi kalyaan karengey........Hamara Baba Sai kitnaa Bholanath fraakdil hai. Tumko bhi fraakdil ban-na chaahiye. Yagya may Dadhichi Rishi misal haddiyaan deni hoti hai. Baap kahtey hain sweet luckiest children in the world tum ho jo Baap say varsa lay rahey ho." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 16.07.07, pg 4)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki bachchey chaahtey hain ki tape say ham akshar by akshar Murli sunein. Brahma Baba kay shareee chodney kay baad halanki duniya kay lagbhag sabhi deshon may Ishwariya sevakendra khul khul chukey hain aur saadhnon kee koi kamee nahee hai, lekin shaayad hee kisi center par tape par Shivbaba kee saakaar murliyaan sunee ya sunaai jaati jaati hai. Kya aisa karnaa Shrimat kay anuroop hai?
- Brahma Baba kay dwara Shivbaba kee sunaai hui mool murliyon kee tulnaa may unhee murliyon kee chapi hui prati may bahut sara bhaag kaat diya gayaa hai. Kya aisa karnaa Shrimat kay anuroop hai?

· “You children listen to Baba's Murli also through tape (recorder). Children wish that they should listen word by word through a tape (recorder). Those who are interested, those who are rich, those who are generous would cause the benefit of others too.........Our Baba Sai is so Bholanath (lord of the innocent ones) fraakdil (generous). You should also become generous. One must give one’s bones in the yagya like sage Dadhichi. The Father says - you, who are obtaining the inheritance from the Father, are the sweet luckiest children in the world.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 16.07.07, pg 4 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that children wish to listen to Murli word by word. After Brahma Baba left his body, although Godly Service-Centers have been opened in almost all the countries of the world and there is no dearth of means, but there is hardly any center where people listen to or play the Sakar Murlis of Shivbaba. Is this in accordance with Shrimat?
- When compared to the original Murlis narrated by Shivbaba through Brahma Baba, a considerable portion of the printed versions of the same has been cut. Is doing so in accordance with Shrimat?

*****************************************************************************************

Sookshmavatan

· "Pehley-pehley Brahman varna fir devataa....varnon may aatey hain. Varna toh yahaan hee hain. Sookshmavatan may toh varnon kee baat hee nahee hai. ……Yah bhi jaantey ho jaisi-jaisi bhaavnaa hai, vaisey-vaisey saakshaatkaar ho jata hai. Baaki vahaan koi sarp aadi kee baat nahee hai. Bail bhi vahaan ho na sakey. Sookshmavatan may toh hai hee devataa. Sookshmavatan may jaatey ho – bageecha, fal aadi dekhtey ho. Kya vahaan bageecha hai? Baba saakshaatkaar karaatey hain. Baaki hai nahee. Buddhi kahti hai vahaan sookshmavatan may jhaad aadi ho na sakey. Yah jaroor saakshaatkaar hota hai. Saakshaatkaar bhi yahaan ka karaayengey. Yah sab hain saakshaatkaar. Isko jaadoogari ka khel kahtey hain. Yah koi gyaan nahee hai. Manushya manushya ko Barrister banaatey hain, vah koi jaadoo nahee kahengey. Vah vidya detey hain. Yah tumhaarey ko manushya say devataa banaatey hain nayee duniya kay liye, isliye jaadoogari kahaa jata hai. Divya drishti kee chaabi Baba kay paas honay kay kaaran unko jaadoogar bhi kahaa jata hai. Vah kahtey hain guru ki kripa hai, moorty say saakshaatkaar hua. Us say toh faaydaa kuch bhi nahee. Yahaan toh mehnat kar swayam vah Lakshmi-Narayan, Sita-Ram ban rahey ho.......Baaki saakshaatkaar aadi kee toh chitchat hai, inki aash nahee rahnee chaahiye. Samajhtey hain ab khud Baap aaya hai, toh saakshaatkaar karaa devey, parantu yah sab hai faaltu. Fir saakshaatkaar na honay say naaumeed ho padhaai chod detey hain." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 10.09.07, pg 2&3)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki sookshmavatan may vaastav may kuch bhi hota nahee. Yah sirf saakshaatkaar kee baat hai. Us say faaydaa kuch bhi nahee hai. Lekin yah dekha gayaa hai ki hamaarey Ishwariya parivaar may trance aur saakshaatkaar ko adhik mahatwa diya ja rahaa hai. Kya aisa karnaa Shrimat kay anuroop hai?

· “First of all (we) come in the Brahmin caste/class, then the deity (class)....... classes. The classes are only here. There is no question of classes in the subtle world at all…. ….You know that as is one’s feelings, so is the vision that is caused. Nonetheless, there is no matter of any snake etc. there. There can’t even be bulls there. In the subtle world, there are only deities. You visit the subtle world – you see garden, fruits, etc. Is there any garden there? Baba causes vision. But it does not exist. The intellect says – there cannot be trees etc. in the subtle world. It is certainly a vision. The vision would also be caused about here (i.e. this world). All this is a vision. This is called a game of magic. This is not knowledge. Human beings make other human beings Barristers; that would not be called a magic. They give knowledge. This one transforms you from a human being to a deity for the new world. That is why it is called magic. Baba is also called a magician because he has the key to visions with him. They say it is by guru's grace; the idol caused vision. There is no benefit in it. Here you are yourself becoming Lakshmi-Narayan, Sita-Ram by hard work......As regards visions etc. it is just chitchat. One should not wish/hope for that. They feel that now when Baba Himself has come, He should cause vision. But all this is wasteful. Then, if divine vision is not caused, they become disheartened and leave the study.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 10.09.07, pg 2&3 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that there is nothing in the subtle world actually. It is only a matter of the vision. There is no benefit in it. But it has been observed that more importance is being given to trance and vision in our Godly family. Is it in accordance with the Shrimat to do so?

****************************************************************************************

Brahma would leave body

· "Samjho Brahma chalaa jaataa hai toh bhi tumko Yaad toh ShivBaba ko karnaa hai. Shareeer toh chootega hee. Tumko Yaad unko karnaa hai. ShivBaba kahtey hain sirf mujhey hee Yaad karo. Kisi dehdhaari ko Yaad nahee karnaa hai." (BKs dwara prakaashit revised Sakar Murli taareekh 24.07.07, pg 3&4)
- Baba toh kah rahey hain ki Samjho Brahma chalaa jaataa hai toh bhi tumko Yaad toh ShivBaba ko karnaa hai. Aur Baba yah bhi kah rahey hain ki Brahma ka shareeer toh chootega hee. Lekin Murliyon may toh Baba nay kaha hai ki vay ant tak padhaatey rahengey. Toh Brahma kay shareeer chootney kay baad vah sakar saharirdhari kaun hai jiskay dwara Parampita Shiv abhi bhi padhaai padhaa rahey hain, jiskay dwara hamey Shivbaba ko yaad karnaa hai?
- Shivbaba toh kah rahey hain ki Brahma ka shareeer choot jaaye toh bhi yaad Shivbaba ko karnaa hai, kisi dehdhaari ko nahee. Toh fir Brahman parivaar may hamaarey kisi bhai ya behen kay shareeer chodney par aansu bahaanaa aur uskee tasveeron ko sevakendron par lagaanaa Shrimat kay anuroop hai?
· “Suppose this Brahma departs, even then you have to remember ShivBaba. The body will certainly be left. You have to remember Him. ShivBaba says - Remember only me. One must not remember any bodily being.” (Revised Sakar Murli dated 24.07.07, pg 3&4 published by BKs)
- Baba is telling that suppose this Brahma departs, even then you have to remember ShivBaba. And Baba is also telling that Brahma’s body will certainly be left. But Baba has said in the Murlis that He will continue to teach till the end. So, after Brahma has left his body, which is that corporeal body, through whom the Supreme Father Shiv is still teaching us and through whom we have to remember Shivbaba?
- Shivbaba is telling that even if Brahma leaves his body, you must remember Shivbaba, and not any bodily being. Then, is it in accordance with the Shrimat to shed tears when a brother or sister from our Brahmin family leaves his body or to display their pictures at the centers?

*****************************************************************************************************

Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishwavidyalaya

S.No.
Name of the city / town
Address
Phone / Mobile No.

1 Delhi
A -1, 351-352, Vijayvihar, Rithala,
Delhi -110085,
(011) 27044227
(0) 9891370007

2 Kampil
Village Kampil, District - Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh, PIN-207505
(0) 9839071989

3 Farrukhabad
5/26 A, Sikkatarbagh, Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh, PIN-209 625
(0) 9335683627

4 Kolkata
CL-249, Sector-2, Salt Lake City, Calcutta-700 091
(033) 2337 8007

5 Chandigarh
H.No. 634, Keshoram Complex,
Opposite Sector-45 C, P.O. Budail,
Chandigarh, PIN-160047
(0172) 2622829

6 Mumbai
Patil House, Azad Chowk, Khari gaon, Taluka Kalwa, District Thane,
Mumbai-400605
(022) 25396765

7 Hyderabad
29/3 RT, Prakashnagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad - 500 016
(040) 27765871

8 Bangalore
Shivjyoti Nilayam, 138, First Main,
Uday Nagar, Post Doorvaninagar, Bangalore-560 016
(0) 9341674550

9 Tadepalligudem
Sai Durga Lorry Water Service,
Tanuku Road, Tadepalligudem,
District- West Godavari-534 102 (AP)
(08818) 227029

10 Lucknow
S/99, Chandrama Market,
Bhootnath Main Market, Indiranagar, U.P- 226016
(0522) 6521307

11 Jammu
Tehsil-Hiranagar, District Kathua, Chakdayala PIN-184144
(01922) 255213

12 Nilanga
Londeynagar, Nilanga, District - Latur (Maharashtra) PIN-413521
(02384) 240410

13 Anantpur
AIVV, Door No. 28-3-806, Near Shivbalayogi Ashram, Kadiri Road,
A.P, PIN - 515002
(08554) 645517

Email: a1spiritual@sify.com Website: www.pbks.info